Background

In mixed-voltage SoCs, high-current TVS clamps coexist with low-voltage core devices. While TVS ensures strong ESD discharge capability, its low-resistance clamp path may reduce effective well resistance and increase parasitic SCR susceptibility.

Strong clamp path + Low well resistance + Cross-domain adjacency = Latch-up risk amplifier

Failure Mechanism

The CMOS parasitic PNPN structure forms a natural SCR path. When well regions are shared or insufficiently isolated across voltage domains, holding current can decrease, making latch-up more likely during bias ramp or transient stress.

LDL-Based Structural Verification

Topology Checks

Resistance Qualification

Unlike traditional DRC, LDL combines topology and resistance awareness, preventing structural latch-up candidates before silicon validation.

TVS Characterization & Measurement Methodology

DC Characterization

TLP (Transmission Line Pulse)

VF-TLP

Latch-Up Susceptibility Testing

Laboratory Environment & Tools

In a TVS product development environment, the following equipment and software stack is typically used:

Measurement Equipment

Software & Simulation

Correlation: Structural Verification vs Physical Validation

LDL structural screening identifies cross-domain low-resistance paths before tape-out. Laboratory TLP and latch-up testing confirm increased holding current margin and improved snapback stability.

Structural verification (LDL) + Physical validation (Lab characterization) = Robust TVS qualification flow

Technical Takeaways

Traditional DRC verifies geometry. LDL verifies robustness. Laboratory validation confirms device physics.

Back to Case Studies | Home